The highly decorated Lakers player will be eligible for a no-trade clause in his next contract, according to ESPN’s Bobby Marks and Dave McMenamin. In light of reports that the Golden State Warriors approached the Los Angeles Lakers about trading for James, this is a significant development in his storyline. However, the 39-year-old can only be granted this privilege if he re-signs with the Lakers.
All of which begs the question: is it enough to keep James in purple and gold?
LeBron James Eligible for No-Trade Clause In New Contract
As noted by ESPN’s Bobby Marks and Dave McMenamin, LeBron James can become the first player in NBA history to make $500 million in career earnings next season. This is the case whether he picks up his $51.4 million player option with the Los Angeles Lakers, or signs a new contract with them.
With a Jun. 29 deadline to decide on his player option, James very well could foray into free agency.
That may not exactly mean James is available. In a tried and true method to put pressure on the front offices of champion contenders, James has declined player options in the past and re-upped on 1+1-year contracts. In these situations, while he may acknowledge other teams’ interests, he isn’t truly being bid on by interested franchises. To that point, James is “eligible to sign a two-year, $112 million extension with the Lakers starting Aug. 18.”
However, there’s a sense that this time around, James really could leave the Lakers.
For one, L.A. doesn’t have much future flexibility due to the CBA’s roster-building restrictions for teams overly reliant on using their pocketbooks to build championship contenders. That may be the most significant factor in James deciding to leave as a free agent. In 2014 and 2018, James left the Miami Heat and Cleveland Cavaliers respectively for similar reasons.
Secondly, James has had less success with the Lakers than he’s had with any other team. From 2011 to 2018, James reached the NBA Finals every year, winning three championships in that span. Since joining the Lakers in 2018, he’s reached the Finals once (winning a championship in that lone appearance). L.A. is now 193-141 with James, their .578 win percentage is solid but relatively unimpressive.
Between those two realities, it’s not difficult to envision James leaving Hollywood.
No-Trade Clause, No Benefit?
While having a no-trade clause is nice, in this scenario, it’s all but irrelevant.
LeBron James is unlikely to be traded unless he or the Los Angeles Lakers are struggling. To that point, James is unlikely to want to be handcuffed to a team that’s on their last legs just as much as L.A. is unlikely to want to commit a sizable salary to a player producing at a substandard level. The Lakers faced that challenge with Kobe Bryant at the end of his career. Financially strapped, Los Angeles was unable to build a championship contender around Bryant that would have allowed him to ride into the sunset.
LeBron James to the Knicks?
LeBron James is no stranger to putting on a show, and before the 2023-24 NBA trade deadline, he did just that.
Following a victory over the New York Knicks on Feb. 3, James walked around donning a towel with their logo.
